Spin Uncertainty Despite Certain Outcome
That's quantum mechanics for you. Check for photo
The primary season will begin and end tomorrow. The sudden irrelevance of that democratic--even overly democratic--institution came after a rising distrust of the whole partisan system. R.I.P.?
It's a power game now, as the Trumpites have a real foothold in the government, despite the Democratic President. The stakes are huge: China, Russia, and even North Korea and Iran are licking their chops at the end of American global leadership they have reason to anticipate.
The crisis of immigration is just another case in which America--by which I mean, the Federal government of the US--shows the limits of its power. It's a result of our lawless global political framework (using the term loosely) and the collapse of populous states. There will be more of them.
Within the government's limited realm, though, the executive power of the President has only risen since the days of Johnson, Nixon, and the like. These Presidents may talk about the unlimited nature of Presidential power, but not about themselves in that role. Meanwhile, each has looked to expand powers. Congress' moves to limit Presidents fall short repeatedly. We would be turning loose a monster.
It's a shame that this New Hampshire Republican primary will be likely the only meaningful decision point before we effectively go into the general election.
As least as far as the two major parties and the selection of the Presidential candidates. A lot of interest will then go onto the possibility of third-party alternatives. The only one that interests me is the one implied by Chris Christie's "failure" to endorse Nikki Haley*. I see him and Liz Cheney deciding to run and get on ballots, most importantly to get into debates (ones Trump would use that excuse to escape). I'm not sure who gets "on top", though: I'm thinking Liz, unless Chris goes for the Ozempic soon. (I apologize for that one.)
RFKJR polling way better than he has any reason to do indicates the range of opportunity that lies out there. His numbers will surely go down, and I doubt he will end up qualifying for any debates, though a Libertarian endorsement could change that. In the case of Cheney-Christie, though, a few percentage of Republicans, maybe a significant result in a couple of states, could mean the difference.
Meanwhile, the Democrats
The Biden campaign has badly handled the question of the initial primary. Now there will be undue attention to how an unauthorized write-in campaign does against a couple of throwaway candidates (Rep. Dean Phillip and the lovely Marianne Williamson). And the fact that Independents are being furiously wooed (mostly by Democrats) to come out to defeat the Party of Dickhead can only reduce Democratic turnout.
The bottom line is that a candidate never wins by refusing to participate in the election. That is a general rule, for my money one that applies even in countries with elections that are truly fixed. And Trump above all knows that first you compete and then complain about the result being fixed.
This does have a farcical recapitulation of 1968 feeling to me. Incumbent LBJ withdrew after New Hampshire write-ins that year led Clean Gene McCarthy's quixotic antiwar campaign to finish behind incumbent President Lyndon Johnson by only a small margin. The war situation is not the same, but there's simmering discontent in the Democratic tent, too. Unimaginably, there is risk.
The last third-party run to earn electoral votes electorally was in 1968, after a chaotic series of events. The person gaining those states, which came short of throwing the election into the House but could well have done so, was George Wallace of Alabama. (Ross Perot never won any, with a much higher percentage of votes.) I could see Trump losing a Republican state like Utah, Montana or North Carolina due to a strong third-party run by an establishment Republican ticket running third-party, whether the electoral votes actually accrue to the Cheney-Christie team (Would they/could they then throw their votes to Biden? Could be historic!) or, more likely, make possible a sneaky Biden win of a state or two not fully expected.
Biden has made New Hampshire competitive, I daresay. The good news is that Trump's militant anti-Islamic bigotry is making that theoretical run to take Biden on in Michigan very unlikely for him.
*Nikki, nikki tekel upharsin - you have been measured, Nikki, and found wanting.
No comments:
Post a Comment