Chuck, Well-done!
I salute Sen. Majority Leader Schumer in his call for new elections in Israel.
I respond to those who object to interference in another nation's affairs by pointing to interference in past political affairs here by the same unprincipled man now heading Israel's government. The extremist nature of Netanyahu's coalition is temporarily overshadowed only by the necessities of active warfare, but the conduct of neither does honor to Israel. They take their cues from us, or vice versa; we need to seek what's right from one of our closest allies to be true to ourselves.
There is also the fact that Schumer--to be plain-spoken about it, a classic New York Jewish politician--is the one to make the call. If friends can't call friends, who can they call? Schumer's loyalty to Israel over the years, through thick and thin, is unquestionable by anyone of any stripe.
Is anyone in Israel listening? I think the answer is 'Yes'. For one thing, they know that President Biden, who is playing this very cagily, could have stopped Schumer from making the statement at this time. His response upon receiving prior notification appears to have been, "Go ahead. Knock yourself out." (Schumer taking that as permission...)
I have only one question: To whom is this call addressed? Did he miss the Benny Gantz visit? Was he the only one who did (besides Biden, who dodged it)? In my view, the intended recipients are Schumer's contacts among Likud, who are "ghosting" that call for now. One more humanitarian disaster is still required.
I heard the contours of the newly-proposed deal reported tonight. These seem more reasonable for a partial hostage release and six-week ceasefire, with the threat of an (approved) Rafah offensive by Israel, accompanied by some (panic) evacuations of civilians hanging over the head if Hamas doesn't take it. I think Hamas will do so, once the appropriate ratio of prison release is determined (somewhere around 20:1 has been empirically observed, so far, in deaths; that provides a rough estimate).
If the Hamas counter-offer after temporary ceasefire is release of all hostages for permanent ceasefire, Israel should take it, even if the terms require relaxation of the current siege. (This Netanyahu government wouldn't take it, of course, either way. Thus the Schumer ask.) When and if Hamas violated the ceasefire again, Israel could continue the liquidation campaign, and they would have the hostage situation finally ended. That is why Hamas will never release all the hostages they control.
The outcome obtained by Israel so far is the middle result: not the complete removal of the Hamas leadership, which was the stated war aim, but more than the minimal one of making Northern Gaza into a buffer zone, buying critical moments of time for their defense against future launched attacks from Gaza. Effectively, they have a siege around the remaining parts of Hamas-dominated Gaza, as long as the Rafah border with Egypt holds.
My conclusion, and Schumer's, is that there is no way forward, no partners for enduring peace. Time to shake things up, politically. What he really is looking forward to is a parliamentary coup, a change in authority, with Netanyahu out as PM, but it is slightly more diplomatic to ask for new elections, which if they occurred, would produce the desired result, but much too slowly. (Schumer also called for changes in the West Bank and in Gaza.) Gantz' message is that he would still need to liquidate Hamas if he were to lead the government.
Ukraine Slava!
Winter in the plains of Ukraine is no time for heavy ground maneuvers. There has been a season of hunkering down, while the Russian artillery and missiles faced less defensive interception or retaliatory strikes. That period has to end soon; the clock is ticking. Speaker Mike Johnson is trying to find the formula to allow the foreign aid bill to get approval without doing anything. Very laissez-faire! Doesn't quite get 'er done, though...
Europe is filling in, for the moment. Even the rightists are seeing the light, as Hungary approves Sweden's joining NATO and Georgia Meloni's far-right Italian government is fully backing Ukraine's cause.
Immigration
If you think this belongs in the forthcoming domestic affairs post, I choose to differ. Migration is a worldwide problem, and the global nature of the challenge is beginning to be felt more acutely on our southern border now--before, it seemed just a hemispheric problem (which it is, also). I do think there is a hemispheric solution to the problem, one that requires active participation with Mexico for mutual benefit. It would look like massive expansion of a US consulate in one of the northern Mexican cities, Monterrey, maybe. There is precedent for that kind of cooperation, but it's the kind of idea that doesn't get traction. The only kind of workable solution moves the problem off our shore/border, but we pay for (cheaper) services in the chosen focus location.
Viewing The Trumpian Menace from the Outside
Any sensible foreign government should have considered both of the two main outcomes of this election and what their national interest should require for each. If one outcome is particularly bad for their country, it only makes sense to do what they can to affect the outcome, only being careful that they not have it backfire and produce a contrary effect.
For the most part, though, it neither makes sense to commit too much for the Biden win strategy, nor for a Trump one. Best not to commit. Thus the Taiwan's election led to a clear status quo outcome, Xi has pulled back a little from his aggressive posture, and the great democracy of Indonesia takes a more studied distance from the pro-Obama Widjojo days. Even Putin knew enough to say he preferred Biden because he is more predictable: unarguable, yet showing respect for the internationally-infamous Drumpfen unpredictability. Japan, India and Korea seem more concerned with domestic affairs--well, why not? So are we.
That seems to be the strategy with regard to mitigating climate change, every nation doing its own thing, the combined effect being neither synergistic nor sufficient. I won't deny progress is being made, both in developing alternative energy sources and in raising awareness. But the global temperature is progressing on the graph toward the upper-right corner, too, as is the graph of major serious weather events. .
More elections coming all over, I hear. In the U.K., the ruling Conservative party is in a position similar to Netanyahu's, with a serious parliamentary drubbing forthcoming when the election is finally called. In England's case, though, there's a statutory requirement that will make it happen this year. It will be interesting to see how the Labour party will change the path, seemingly irreversible, that is steadily moving London away from relevancy. Argentina threw in its lot with a major shake-up in a Trumpian direction, but that is an extreme reaction with plenty of popular frustration behind it.
The Summer Olympics
The Paris Olympics will be held this summer, after the Republican convention and before the Democratic one. I am hopeful they will provide a welcome distraction from the political wars. So far, I've heard too little about the preparations for them, either here or there. I did hear a few sports (softball, baseball among them) are not being retained; I've heard each sport federation is making its own rules on transgendered, I've heard those Russians who haven't failed their drug tests will be competing under the Olympics flag, not their own. That's about it. I haven't heard much about the USA teams in specific sports.
I'm very idiosyncratic about this, both a strong supporter of the Olympic ideal and a fervent opponent of the way it is done with all the nationalism, which is contrary to that ideal. It is possible to make the centralized sport federations able to conduct competition qualification, but the block to that is that the resources would have to be provided by nations, perhaps through the medium of the United Nations. This will no doubt feature in my upcoming listing of my brilliant ideas so far not picked up by anyone....
The Oscars
A bit of a stretch, I admit, to consider the awards of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, basically a LA.-centered bunch, in the international affairs category. There were several awards given outside of the US film center, once again--let us not forget the recent-year successes of "Parasite" and "Everything, Everywhere, All at Once"--but the liberal US coastal elite judgments were clearly present. As an electoral body, quite predictable.
"American Fiction" winning the adapted screenplay suited the self-referential critical Zeitgeist, for sure. So did the award to local comeback hero Robert Downey, Jr. for his role as the McCarthy-ist foil to Oppenheimer, post-bomb. Above all, note the John & Yoko-inspired animated short winner calling for "Peace Now" (Sean Lennon on the scene)--I preferred the French "Pachyderme", if one wants to go deeper.
The award for documentary feature to "20 Days in Mariupol" showing the brutality of the war in Ukraine also showed that liberal sensibility, which now increasingly shows some awareness of the world beyond. (My point being that the show tells.) There was also the Godzilla movie getting the award for effects, the Mayazaki film winning the animated feature, and the four awards to the itinerant sci-fi costume drama "Poor Things", the movie that finally showed what Yorgos Lanthimos could achieve. "Zone of Interest" dominated the foreign film lane, a bit of a ruse for the British production, but it was performed and filmed on location at Auschwitz in the original languages (German, Polish, Yiddish), which is a real credential to be foreign to us. Finally, I mention "Anatomy of a Fall", the one that got away (likewise, I couldn't catch it at the cine.).
To close, we transition through the shocker highlight of the Oscars' Obit show, the face of Alexei Navalny. With the eponymous documentary feature of the previous year an Oscars winner, they earned the right.
Shocking but not surprising, Navalny's death was a challenge to the world, a pure expression of ruthlessness. Navalny will be taking the cherished position in that square of political martyrs that many cities in Russia now have. There are others that are due to have places in this pantheon. But not just yet, it seems: Putin may have been faking mortal health symptoms. He has no doubt told his doctors to keep him alive until he can clinch a victory in 2025, though he's not sure which President he has to defeat to do it. When that doesn't happen, he will wither up and give out.
Posts
